The DUFF: Designated Ugly Fat Friend by Kody Keplinger

duffBlurb: Seventeen-year-old Bianca Piper is cynical and loyal, and she doesn’t think she’s the prettiest of her friends by a long shot. She’s also way too smart to fall for the charms of man-slut and slimy school hottie Wesley Rush. In fact, Bianca hates him. And when he nicknames her “the Duff,” she throws her Coke in his face.

But things aren’t so great at home right now, and Bianca is desperate for a distraction. She ends up kissing Wesley. Worse, she likes it. Eager for escape, Bianca throws herself into a closeted enemies-with-benefits relationship with him.


This book gave me acid reflux. And I don’t mean that in a good way.

I’ll say this now: To all the girls who ever felt lesser, who didn’t feel beautiful, who felt like they could have been better, you deserve better than Bianca Piper.

This book tries so hard to be a story of reckoning for girls who have felt lesser. I know how this may be appealing; everyone, myself included, has at one point felt lesser, smaller, or less worthy than someone in comparison. It’s not a nice feeling. It’s horrible. This book tries to turn that upside down – it tries to give power to the other girls for a change.

However instead of being something that was empowering and self-actualizing, this book succeeds in perpetuating a problem: girl/girl competition or girl-hate, a symptom of internalized misogyny. Bianca prides herself in being a character that doesn’t care what people think, but Bianca’s contempt for these girls isn’t rooted to her self-confidence, it is rooted to her belief that she is better than some girls, because being beautiful and skinny and having sex partners has a negative correlation with intelligence, compassion, and value as a human being.

My problem isn’t that Bianca believes this. Bianca’s beliefs could be attributed to character flaw; Bianca could just be a narrow-minded character. My problem is that Keplinger doesn’t acknowledge that Bianca’s beliefs are problematic (or worse, Keplinger doesn’t think they are problematic at all), and there is no hint that perhaps Bianca is not a great person as she believes. Keplinger is trying to play on the underdog trope – a girl who is supposedly lacking in exterior beauty but is a human cornucopia of positive qualities that we are meant to identify with or root for.

The Irony (with a capital I) is that irrespective of Bianca’s appearance, she is not beautiful on the inside. Bianca is a horrible person through and through; she is arrogant, she has no respect for her friends, she is incessantly, unnecessarily rude to everyone (except to the boy she likes, wow, what a surprise), she is bitter and complains about every petty thing, and she calls herself ‘intelligent’ because she believes that teenagers don’t fall in love (except they can), and Valentines Day is stupid.

Give me a fucking break.

Example: In the second chapter of the book, she says, “I am intelligent. I am a good person.” Later on in the same chapter, she says, “I freely admit that I hate girls who say they love someone before they’ve dated them.” (I’ve been sitting here for ten minutes trying to think of what I could say about this, but I can’t think of anything general-audience friendly, so let your imagination do the work. So I’ll prompt you; it starts with “WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAT-“)

If this book wasn’t written in a way that framed Bianca as a good-person protagonist, then it would have been okay. There have been plenty of books where the protagonist had problematic views or attitudes. The difference is that they were later followed by self-awareness which led to self-growth. In The DUFF, all tone and narrative indicate that Bianca is intended to be perceived as a good person. (Except she isn’t.)

Bianca’s character is the sort of character that impressionable and naive people think are cool – ‘intelligent’, cynical, snarky – but in actuality, these people are extremely unpleasant and rude, develop manipulative habits or superiority complexes, and will probably become toxic people in your life. She should not be the sort of character that readers should feel obligated to identify with – not by a long shot.

The sex was surprisingly a very integral component of this book (then again, I didn’t know what to expect when my friend recommended me this book). I’m not against sex in YA. I think sex can be a very meaningful, positive thing between two characters. So here’s my qualm, but with a disclaimer: Maybe it is because I’m demisexual, but I just don’t understand how two people who do nothing but have sex and have one heart-to-heart can fall in love, or, at the very least, feel a deep emotional connection with one another. It doesn’t make sense to me. If a friend of mine proclaimed to be in love with someone after one intimate discussion with them, I would take said friend firmly by the shoulders and shake her vigorously.

More importantly to note, the romance is based on an unhealthy co-dependence, and this isn’t even addressed in the story. It sounds nice and maybe ‘cute’ in a story especially since the ending is ‘happy’, but it was an unrealistic portrayal of a relationship with such an unstable dynamic. What happened in the end was the best possible outcome. This book relies too much on inducing spontaneous excitement, and too little on making sense. Perhaps Keplinger’s goal was to use the former to subdue the latter.

The DUFF could have been a book about inner beauty. It could have been a book about mistakes. There’s a spiel about being kind to one another and not judging one another, but I think the only one who gained something from that revelation is Bianca. Compassion and tolerance are core in basic social skills and common decency. It is astounding (and insulting to teenagers) that this revelation was this book’s climax, and that it was even a ‘revelation’ in the first place. (Frankly, Mean Girls did it better, and it had a lot more honesty.)

I just couldn’t stand the narrative. It was grating, it was agonizing. I cheered when I finished it because I was so happy it was over. I have never (never!) been more happy to finish a book.

To end, I would like to share a quote. This was the last straw for me, when the violin string snapped, when loathe replaced confusion.

“Brontë?” I asked, seeing the cover of his book. “Wuthering Heights? Isn’t that a little girly, Toby?”

“Have you read it?”

“Well, no,” I admitted. “I’ve read Jane Eyre, which was definitely full of early feminism. I’m not saying that’s a problem. Personally, I’m a total feminist, but it’s a little sketchy for a teenage boy.”

*rips this book to shreds*

Rating: 1/5

Book Information:
Book Name: The DUFF: Designated Ugly Fat Friend
Author: Kody Keplinger
Publisher: Little/Brown Poppy

Advertisements

11 thoughts on “The DUFF: Designated Ugly Fat Friend by Kody Keplinger

  1. Such an honest review. I was planning on reading this thinking that while the movie didn’t get positive reception, the book would probably have otherwise. Thanks for the heads up! :)

    • Thank you, Trisha Ann! :)
      Usually I’d ask you to try it despite my negative review, but trust me, save your brain cells and time. They are better used for better books.

  2. When this received a lot of hype prior to the release of the movie I added it to my TBR, but after watching the movie (and reading your review) I’m having some qualms. I thought the movie was fun but it wasn’t a new Mean Girls classic or a book I wanted to read. Many readers have promised me the book is better than the movie but after reading Bianca’s Wuthering Heights comment to Toby… :o Oh and I commend you on pioneering through. I usually try to finish all books whether I liked them or not, but 1 star worthy books just warrant an immediate resolve of DNFing.

    • My advice is to skip this book completely and give your time to better books. I really tried to enjoy it just to ‘enjoy’ it, but this book made it impossible. D:

      Haha, thank you! I try to finish all my books too, and believe me I wanted to DNF this book at least 4 times, but I wanted to soldier through it so I had judgement rights, hehehe. :D

  3. Did you finish the book? I’m just curious, cause there’s a whole bit at the end where Bianca realises the internalised misogyny and her unfair treatment of other girls.
    “Calling Vikki a slut or a whore was just like calling someone the Duff. It was insulting and hurtful, and it was one of those titles that just fed off of an inner fear every girl must have from time to time. Slut, bitch, prude, tease, ditz. They were all the same. Every girl felt like one of these sexist labels described her at some point.”
    But I agree, the concept could have been done better.

    • Hi Fiona!

      Yes I did finish the book, and perhaps I should’ve addressed that in my review to avoid misrepresenting this book. Thank you for pointing it out, I may have to reevaluate how I wrote my review.

      My issue with that particular scene was that it was glossed over very quickly. To me, it seemed more like some obligatory resolution rather than something meaningful in Bianca’s character development. Furthermore, at that point of the book, I found it difficult to trust the author’s word. Bianca (and in extension the author) has a very misconstrued idea of feminism, so, I suppose I didn’t buy it.

      And yes I agree! It should have been done better, and more pages could have gone into her realization.

      • Yeah that’s true :) I found that Bianca’s narrative was pretty much exactly what I thought when I was in early high school (before I discovered feminism). So I found that part very realistic and thought it was great to draw people in with those views with that. BUT Bianca’s realisation that she was wrong + sexist should have been addressed much better I think, to really get the point across to the audience.

        • I can relate! Perhaps I am being too harsh on these young voices for being ignorant about the wider implications of feminism. You make a good point; perhaps it will gauge people to think about that stuff, and if that’s the case, I cannot fault the book (too much) for it.

          I agree! But then again, at that point of the book it was all about ~*Wesley*~ so, hahahaha. Ah well. Hopefully the author will do it better next time. :P

  4. The heroine needs to get off her fauxminist high horse, it seems. I am do grossed out by the idea that beautiful girls with successful relationship automatically mean stupid/shallow people. That kind of hate and envy solves nothing. I was about to purchase this today but it looks like you saved me some hard earned dollars CW! wonderful review as always :)

    • Thank you Aentee! <3

      To be fair, as Fiona pointed out in a comment, the character DOES realize that she's been unfair to judge other girls… in the second to last chapter. Personally, I'd skip this one though, but if you want to read it, I'd hit the library.

Leave a Reply! I'd love to hear your thoughts/comments. <3

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s